All use cases

One retained signal path for incident evidence

Build a logs-first observability foundation

Collect operational events through the tools you already use, retain changing context and investigate with search and SQL from one data foundation.

Your dashboards show that something changed, but the evidence needed to explain it is split between short-lived logs, service metadata and separate operational stores.

Observability improves when the signal and the evidence behind it remain connected.

The pain

A signal is visible; its context is somewhere else

01

Collectors and schemas vary from team to team.

02

High-volume evidence is discarded before the next investigation.

03

Trace and service identifiers are present but difficult to correlate.

04

Search, aggregation and historical analysis follow different paths.

UNIFYLOGS / OBSERVABILITY DATA PATH

The whole signal path, not another isolated search box.

Unifylogs is strongest as a logs-first observability foundation: keep high-volume operational evidence together, preserve context and move from fast retrieval to analytical SQL without exporting the incident.

01

Collect

OpenTelemetry

Structured logs and correlated IDs

Log shippers

Vector · Fluent Bit · Logstash

Kafka

Buffer high-volume event paths

02

Ingest

Source templates

App · Kubernetes · security

Routine Load

Continuous Kafka consumption

Stream Load

HTTP push from services

03

Store & index

Inverted indexes

Structured and full-text retrieval

VARIANT

Evolving nested attributes

Time lifecycle

Partitioned retention by workload

04

Investigate

Log Explorer

Timeline · search · filters

SQL Studio

Join, group and correlate

Shared context

Service · host · pod · trace ID

05

Act

Dashboards

Operational views and trends

AI assistance

Evidence-backed investigation

Team workflows

Export or connect downstream

Logs-first by design. Trace IDs and metric-like aggregates can enrich an investigation without implying a full APM or tracing replacement.

BUILD PLAN / LOGS-FIRST OBSERVABILITY

Connect the incident path before expanding the signal set

Begin with the evidence behind one recurring alert. Preserve correlation fields, retention and source context, then prove that the same incident can move from search to SQL without a manual export.

01Collectors · OTel
02Kafka · HTTP
03Doris event tables
04Explorer · SQL · export
DORIS DATA DESIGN
  • Partition events by time and set retention per signal workload.
  • Index message and high-value identity fields; keep changing attributes in VARIANT.
  • Carry service, host, pod and trace identifiers as typed correlation columns.
  • Materialize only repeated operational aggregations after measuring their query pattern.
BUILD IT IN UNIFYLOGS
  • Use source templates to standardize the first application and infrastructure feeds.
  • Validate the generated collector configuration and table design before deployment.
  • Investigate the same retained event set in Log Explorer and SQL Studio.
  • Share bounded query results with existing dashboard and response workflows.
BEFORE CUTOVER

Acceptance gates

  • 1Alert window is reproducible
  • 2Correlation IDs survive ingestion
  • 3Retention matches incident needs
  • 4No manual export is needed for the test question

What changes

The operating pattern changes—not only the tool.

  • One durable starting point for operational investigations
  • Shared service and infrastructure context across teams
  • Search and analytical questions on the same retained data
  • A logs-first foundation that complements metrics and tracing tools

CONTACT / HUBSPOT

Bring one workload. Leave with a measured decision.

We’ll map the current cost and investigation path, then define success criteria before you replace anything.